The Need for Comprehensive Legislation on Climate Change: Evaluating the Supreme Court's Ruling
The recent Supreme Court ruling on climate change has shed light on the absence of a dedicated legislation in India addressing climate change and related issues. While the Court acknowledged the right against adverse effects of climate change, it brings to the forefront the lack of a centralized legislative framework to tackle environmental challenges effectively. Despite governmental policies and discussions on climate change impacts, the Indian Constitution does not explicitly outline a decentralized structure to address environmental concerns.
The fragmented legal architecture in India raises questions about the constitutional recognition of environmental importance and climate change mitigation. The absence of a holistic approach to environmental protection highlights the need for comprehensive legislation that encompasses all aspects of environmental conservation and climate change adaptation. The power to legislate on environmental matters under Article 253 of the Constitution underscores the significance of aligning national laws with international agreements and conventions.
In light of the evolving climate crisis, the Supreme Court's ruling emphasizes the urgency for a unified legal framework that empowers both the central government and states to address environmental emergencies effectively. By fostering local decision-making and enhancing environmental protection measures, India can navigate the challenges posed by climate change and work towards a sustainable future for all.
0 Comments